How should states support pregnant teens?
A national poll suggests that most adults with children favor some type of state support for pregnant teens. But how strongly someone feels about that and whether the help comes with caveats may be influenced by the person’s gender.
©Puwadol Jaturawutthichai/shutterstock.com
A national poll suggests that most adults with children favor some type of state support for pregnant teens. But how strongly someone feels about that and whether the help comes with caveats may be influenced by the person’s gender.
The
findingsare from the C.S. Mott Children’s Hospital National Poll on Children’s Health. It was commissioned by the University of Michigan institution and conducted by GfK Custom Research, LLC.
For the research, a randomly selected, stratified group of 2,005 parents aged 18 and older were polled. The sample was from GfK’s web-enabled KnowledgePanel, which closely resembles the US population, and was weighted to reflect Census Bureau population figures. Administered in November 2017, the survey had a completion rate of 60% with a margin of error of ±2% to 4%.
Many of the poll respondents placed caveats on a pregnant teen’s receipt of state support. Requirements endorsed included attending prenatal visits (90%), taking parenting classes (85%), undergoing drug testing (85%), and finishing high school (78%). Seventy percent of adults felt that all four of those requirements should be met in order for a teen to receive the support.
When asked about the state providing medical care, 60% of adults said it should definitely be offered to pregnant teens and 69% said it should be offered to their babies. Women were more likely than men to believe the state should provide medical care, formula and baby supplies for pregnant teens. The authors of the survey report said that “this may reflect women’s empathy with their situation, or their recognition that in many cases, it is the teen mother – not the father – who pays the financial, emotional and social cost of having a baby.”
Regarding putting caveats around state support for pregnant teens, the researchers cautioned that “the consequence for non-compliance may have a negative impact on the health of the pregnant teen or her baby.” They urged a “thoughtful approach to implementing requirements.”
For more updates from our August issue:
Teen pregnancy, depression and the Internet
Transgender teens: What about fertility preservation?
Current treatments for recurrent bacterial vaginosis leave many patients dissatisfied
February 28th 2025A new study presented at ISSWSH highlights patient dissatisfaction with current treatments for recurrent bacterial vaginosis, emphasizing the need for more effective therapies and improved provider communication.
Read More
No link found between hormonal contraception and clitoral adhesion severity
February 28th 2025A recent study presented at the ISSWSH 2025 Annual Meeting found no significant association between hormonal contraceptive use and the severity of clitoral adhesions, though researchers emphasize the need for further investigation.
Read More
