A national poll suggests that most adults with children favor some type of state support for pregnant teens. But how strongly someone feels about that and whether the help comes with caveats may be influenced by the person’s gender.
©Puwadol Jaturawutthichai/shutterstock.com
A national poll suggests that most adults with children favor some type of state support for pregnant teens. But how strongly someone feels about that and whether the help comes with caveats may be influenced by the person’s gender.
The
findingsare from the C.S. Mott Children’s Hospital National Poll on Children’s Health. It was commissioned by the University of Michigan institution and conducted by GfK Custom Research, LLC.
For the research, a randomly selected, stratified group of 2,005 parents aged 18 and older were polled. The sample was from GfK’s web-enabled KnowledgePanel, which closely resembles the US population, and was weighted to reflect Census Bureau population figures. Administered in November 2017, the survey had a completion rate of 60% with a margin of error of ±2% to 4%.
Many of the poll respondents placed caveats on a pregnant teen’s receipt of state support. Requirements endorsed included attending prenatal visits (90%), taking parenting classes (85%), undergoing drug testing (85%), and finishing high school (78%). Seventy percent of adults felt that all four of those requirements should be met in order for a teen to receive the support.
When asked about the state providing medical care, 60% of adults said it should definitely be offered to pregnant teens and 69% said it should be offered to their babies. Women were more likely than men to believe the state should provide medical care, formula and baby supplies for pregnant teens. The authors of the survey report said that “this may reflect women’s empathy with their situation, or their recognition that in many cases, it is the teen mother – not the father – who pays the financial, emotional and social cost of having a baby.”
Regarding putting caveats around state support for pregnant teens, the researchers cautioned that “the consequence for non-compliance may have a negative impact on the health of the pregnant teen or her baby.” They urged a “thoughtful approach to implementing requirements.”
For more updates from our August issue:
Teen pregnancy, depression and the Internet
Transgender teens: What about fertility preservation?
Early preterm birth risk linked to low PlGF levels during pregnancy screening
November 20th 2024New research highlights that low levels of placental growth factor during mid-pregnancy screening can effectively predict early preterm birth, offering a potential tool to enhance maternal and infant health outcomes.
Read More
Improved maternal cardiac arrest management reported from Obstetric Life Support training
November 19th 2024A study found that Obstetric Life Support education significantly improves health care providers' readiness and outcomes in maternal cardiac arrest management, advocating for broader implementation.
Read More
IUD placement within 48 hours nonsuperior vs 2 to 4 weeks after abortion
November 19th 2024A study reveals no significant difference in 6-month intrauterine device use between placements within 48 hours or 2 to 4 weeks after a second-trimester abortion, though earlier placement carries a higher expulsion risk.
Read More