The 1975 California law that placed caps on non-economic damages awarded in medical malpractice cases reduces both defendants' costs and attorneys' fees, according to a new study by the RAND Institute for Civil Justice. Examining 257 plaintiff verdicts between 1995 and 1999, the study found a 30% reduction in the rate of recovery for plaintiffs and a 60% cut in attorneys' fees.
The 1975 California law that placed caps on non-economic damages awarded in medical malpractice cases reduces both defendants' costs and attorneys' fees, according to a new study by the RAND Institute for Civil Justice. Examining 257 plaintiff verdicts between 1995 and 1999, the study found a 30% reduction in the rate of recovery for plaintiffs and a 60% cut in attorneys' fees.
The California Medical Injury Compensation Reform Act places a $250,000 cap on non-economic damages in medical malpractice cases. It also puts limits on plaintiffs' attorney fees-at 40% of the first $50,000 of recovery, 33% of the next $50,000, 25% of the next $500,000, and 15% of any amount more than $600,000-reported Medical Liability Monitor (8/04).
The study found that, after applying both provisions of the law, plaintiffs' net recoveries were 15% less than they would have been without the cap on damages or fee limits. Researchers also found that:
Get the latest clinical updates, case studies, and expert commentary in obstetric and gynecologic care. Sign up now to stay informed.
Study finds pregnancy risks higher with ART in kidney transplant recipients
July 11th 2025Women with kidney transplants who conceive through assisted reproductive technology face increased risks of complications such as hypertension, preterm birth, and cesarean delivery, according to new research.
Read More