It may be worth checking. Internist Paul Tang, vice president and chief medical information officer of the multispecialty group practice Palo Alto (Calif.) Medical Foundation, says he's seen contracts from electronic and personal health-record vendors that obligate physicians to violate the federal health-care privacy rules under the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act.
It may be worth checking. Internist Paul Tang, vice president and chief medical information officer of the multispecialty group practice Palo Alto (Calif.) Medical Foundation, says he's seen contracts from electronic and personal health-record vendors that obligate physicians to violate the federal health-care privacy rules under the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act.
While such language is not the standard, Tang told Modern Healthcare (7/23/2007), "There are contracts that say they (the vendors) will have real-time access to the database, that they will have exclusive access to the data, that they can resell the data. I think it would be unlawful that covered entities abide by that."
Robert Gellman, an attorney specializing in privacy issues, agrees: "Any contract that deals with ownership of medical data is pretty meaningless, because laws and medical ethics control the rights and responsibilities of medical records."
A Legacy of Excellence: Reflecting on the Final Print Edition of Contemporary OB/GYN
April 25th 2025Marking the end of an era and the beginning of a new chapter, the final print edition of Contemporary OB/GYN celebrates over 50 years of evidence-based guidance and unwavering support for clinicians.
Read More