Cleveland Clinic begins charging for doctors’ time spent responding to some electronic messages.
One of the nation’s largest hospital systems has begun charging for some electronic messages its doctors send to patients.
On November 17 the Cleveland Clinic began billing patients’ insurers for messages that typically take more than five minutes to answer and require a doctor’s “medical expertise,” according to an announcement on the Clinic’s website. Among these are:
Message charges will be billed to patients’ insurers. For Medicare beneficiaries, that could result in an out-of-pocket charge of between$3 and $8. Most commercial insurers cover these messages at little or no cost to the patient, the Clinic says. However, patients with plans that don’t cover messages could see charges anywhere between $33 and $50.
“The provider looking at your message might be reviewing the information you sent over and changing part of your treatment plan, or recommending you get a test to learn more. They might need to look at your medical history and do an in-depth review of your records to make sure they give you the best possible advice,” according to the announcement.
The Clinic uses the MyChart electronic health record for its messaging system.
Providers aren’t billing for:
The Clinic’s announcement comes at a time of financial stress for hospitals and hospitals. The median year-to-date operating margin index for hospitals was -0.1% in September, for a ninth straight month of negative actual operating margins, according to findings in the latest National Hospital Flash Report.
Primary care doctors seemingly endorse getting reimbursed for electronic messaging. In a recent Physicians Foundation survey, 86% said reimbursement for responding to queries through emails, texts, or phone calls was an important tool for enhancing access to care and improving outcomes.
But PatientRightsAdvocate.org, a nonprofit organization advocating price transparency, takes a different view. In an article on cleveland.com, founder and chairman Cynthia A. Fisher calls the practice “egregious.”
“Billing them [patients] for electronic messages to their providers is just the latest attempt to wring even more blood from the stone,” she said.
This article originally appeared on Medical Economics®.
Early preterm birth risk linked to low PlGF levels during pregnancy screening
November 20th 2024New research highlights that low levels of placental growth factor during mid-pregnancy screening can effectively predict early preterm birth, offering a potential tool to enhance maternal and infant health outcomes.
Read More
Improved maternal cardiac arrest management reported from Obstetric Life Support training
November 19th 2024A study found that Obstetric Life Support education significantly improves health care providers' readiness and outcomes in maternal cardiac arrest management, advocating for broader implementation.
Read More
IUD placement within 48 hours nonsuperior vs 2 to 4 weeks after abortion
November 19th 2024A study reveals no significant difference in 6-month intrauterine device use between placements within 48 hours or 2 to 4 weeks after a second-trimester abortion, though earlier placement carries a higher expulsion risk.
Read More