Multicountry study identifies ideal standards for fetal growth

Article

Using ultrasound data from more than 4000 pregnancies in women in 8 countries, researchers have identified ideal standards of fetal growth and development.

 

Using ultrasound data from more than 4000 pregnancies in women in 8 countries, researchers have identified ideal standards of fetal growth and development. The findings, published in The Lancet, represent benchmarks for clinical interpretation of routine ultrasound measurements across populations.

Funded by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, the Fetal Growth Longitudinal Study (FGLS) was designed to develop international growth and size standards for fetuses from conception to birth. Ultrasound was used to take fetal anthropometric measurements in 4,321 women in Brazil, China, India, Italy, Kenya, Oman, the UK, and the United States. All of them had a reliable estimate of gestational age confirmed by ultrasound measurement of crown-rump length in the first trimester. The participants were from urban areas and environments ideal for healthy growth, given access to adequate nutrition, education, low environmental contaminants, and good health care.

Stat Bite: Information sources for the Ob/gyn

The researchers used ultrasound every 5 weeks from 14 weeks’ to 42 weeks’ gestation to take five primary measures of fetal growth: head circumference, biparietal diameter, occipitofrontal diameter, abdominal circumference, and femur length. Mean differences between the observed and smoothed centiles for the 3rd, 50th and 97th centiles, respectively, were small: 2.25 mm (SD 3.0), 0.02 mm (3.0), and -2.69 mm (3.2) for head circumference; 0.83 mm (0.9), -0.05 mm (0.8), and -0.84 mm (1.0) for biparietal diameter; 0.63 mm (1.2), 0.04 mm (1.1), and -1.05 mm (1.3) for occipitofrontal diameter; 2.99 mm (3.1), 0.25 mm (3.2), and -4.22 mm (3.7) for abdominal circumference; and 0.62 mm (0.8), 0.03 mm (0.8), and -0.65 mm (0.8) for femur length. The international standards for fetal growth are represented by the researchers’ calculation of the 3rd, 5th, 10th, 50th, 90th, 95th and 97th centile curves according to gestational age for the ultrasound measures. 


 

 

To get weekly advice for today's Ob/Gyn, subscribe to the Contemporary OB/GYN Special Delivery.

Recent Videos
Ipek Ensari, PhD, highlights improved mental health in chronic pelvic pain from physical activity | Image Credit: scholars.mssm.edu
Mirvie's RNA platform revolutionizes detection of fetal growth restriction | Image Credit: wexnermedical.osu.edu
How early genetic testing empowers parents and improves outcomes | Image Credit: tuftsmedicine.org
Dallas Reed highlights trends and barriers in prenatal genetic testing | Image Credit: tuftsmedicine.org
How maternal fetal medicine specialists improve outcomes for high-risk pregnancies | Image Credit: profiles.mountsinai.org
Screening-to-diagnosis interval vital for gestational diabetes outcomes | Image Credit: ultracon2024.eventscribe.net
Henri M. Rosenberg, MD
Study explores the limits of neighborhood data in predicting preterm birth | Image Credit: linkedin.com
Integrase inhibitors not linked to neonatal weight | Image Credit: linkedin.com
How AI is revolutionizing prenatal detection of congenital heart defects | Image Credit: mfmnyc.com/team.
Related Content
© 2025 MJH Life Sciences

All rights reserved.