When it comes to pay-for-performance programs, recognition of a physician's accomplishments, along with financial rewards, may be the combination needed to produce results.
When it comes to pay-for-performance programs, recognition of a physician's accomplishments, along with financial rewards, may be the combination needed to produce results. In more than half of the seven projects of Rewarding Results-a 3-year, $8.8 million study featuring several pay-for-performance models-the public or private reporting of how frequently physicians met certain quality measures played an important role in improving quality.
Of course, the financial incentive cannot be discounted as a key component. To make a difference, monetary rewards need to be large enough to motivate physicians to effect change. At a minimum, the incentive may need to be set at $5,000 per physician or at least 10% of a doctor's annual income.
While the study does not provide definitive answers for the most appropriate pay-for-performance program, it is a good first step. Suzanne Delbanco, CEO of the Leapfrog Group, an employer coalition devoted to improving health-care quality, told Modern Healthcare (11/21/05), "... what's exciting is that it's really the first tangible evidence we have that pay-for-performance does move health care in the right direction."
Study reports US health rankings to plummet by 2050
December 19th 2024Despite modest increases in life expectancy, the United States is set to fall behind globally in health-adjusted life expectancy because of rising obesity rates and other health risks, according to a comprehensive forecast.
Read More