Updated Guidance for Use of Vaginal Mesh for POP

Article

In further response to the Safety Communication issued by the FDA in July 2011 regarding the use of vaginal mesh, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (The College) and the American Urogynecologic Society (AUGS) jointly state that the use of vaginal placement of synthetic mesh for the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse (POP) should be reserved for high-risk women for whom the benefits may outweigh the risks.

In further response to the Safety Communication issued by the FDA in July 2011 regarding the use of vaginal mesh, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (The College) and the American Urogynecologic Society (AUGS) jointly state that the use of vaginal placement of synthetic mesh for the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse (POP) should be reserved for high-risk women for whom the benefits may outweigh the risks.1 The College and the AUGS also state that there is an urgent need for development of a national registry to track outcomes for all current and future patients who receive vaginal mesh implants.

The specific recommendations of The College and AUGS for use of vaginal mesh include the following1:

• Continued audit and review of outcomes and the creation of a surveillance registry for all current and future vaginal mesh implants.

• Outcome reporting for prolapsed surgical techniques defining success, complications, and total reoperation rates.

• Surgeon training for vaginal mesh placement specific to each device, including surgical experience with reconstructive surgery and thorough understanding of pelvic anatomy

• Rigorous comparative effectiveness trials of synthetic mesh and native tissue repair and long-term follow-up.

•Patient counseling about alternative native tissue repairs and the permanent nature of synthetic mesh, as well as discussion of the risks, benefits, and alternatives to the procedure.

• Limiting use of POP vaginal mesh repair to high-risk women for whom the benefit may justify the risk.

• Adoption of new mesh products and devices only with clinical long-term data demonstrating equal or improved safety and efficacy compared with existing products and devices.

Related Content:

Be Selective When Using Surgical Mesh Transvaginally for Pelvic Organ Prolapse, FDA WarnsShort-Term Versus Long-Term Catheterization After Vaginal Prolapse Surgery: Which Is Better?

Reference:

Committee opinion no. 513: vaginal placement of synthetic mesh for pelvic organ prolapse. Obstet Gynecol. 2011;118:1459.

 

Recent Videos
Mirvie's RNA platform revolutionizes detection of fetal growth restriction | Image Credit: wexnermedical.osu.edu
How early genetic testing empowers parents and improves outcomes | Image Credit: tuftsmedicine.org
Dallas Reed highlights trends and barriers in prenatal genetic testing | Image Credit: tuftsmedicine.org
How maternal fetal medicine specialists improve outcomes for high-risk pregnancies | Image Credit: profiles.mountsinai.org
How the cobas liat assay panels improve STI detection | Image Credit: labqualityconfab.
Screening-to-diagnosis interval vital for gestational diabetes outcomes | Image Credit: ultracon2024.eventscribe.net
Henri M. Rosenberg, MD
Medical experts personalize contraceptive options for complex cases | Image Credit: findcare.ahn.org
Study explores the limits of neighborhood data in predicting preterm birth | Image Credit: linkedin.com
Barbed suture reduces blood loss in hysterectomy | Image Credit: linkedin.com
Related Content
© 2025 MJH Life Sciences

All rights reserved.