Among women who choose IUDs or implants and then discontinue use, the most common subsequent contraceptive choice is another long-acting reversible contraceptive.
Physicians from the department of obstetrics and gynecology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, conducted a retrospective cohort study to better understand women’s choices regarding LARC, specifically duration of use, reasons for discontinuation, and subsequent contraceptive methods. The study results were reported November 14, 2013, at the AAGL’s 42nd Global Congress on Minimally Invasive Gynecology, by Lily Wu, MD, clinical fellow in ob/gyn and reproductive biology.
Study participants included 1236 women who had a LARC device placed for contraception from 2006 through 2011. Of the 938 women with a LARC device who attended a routine 1-month follow-up exam, 93.9% chose IUDs (75.5% levonorgestrel intrauterine system, 18.4% copper intrauterine device) and 6.1% opted for implantable rods. The median patient age was 32.1 years (range, 27.1 to 37.0 years), and median BMI was 26.3 kg/m2 (range, 23.2 to 31.6 kg/m2). Nearly half of the women were white (45.7%), nearly 30% were black (29.65), and 13.6% were Hispanic.
At the 1-month follow-up, 5.3% of IUDs were expelled or discontinued and 0.0% of implants were discontinued. By 1 year, of 748 women with follow-up data, the continuation rate was 72.6% for IUDs and 66.0% for implants. At 1-year follow-up, the primary reason for discontinuation was abdominal or pelvic pain (23.6%) for IUDs and bleeding pattern (62.5%) for implants.
Of those with follow-up data at 2 years (67.4% of 938 women), continuation rates were 50.6% for IUDs and 48.7% for implants. By 4 years, 50.7% of women had follow-up, and 15.7% of IUDs were still in place.
The most common contraceptive method used after discontinuing LARC was another LARC (IUD, 20.3%; implant, 6.6%) followed by no contraception (12.7%).
When asked about the benefits of LARC, Dr. Wu said that it’s a reliable and long-acting form of contraception that requires minimal attention. Patients don’t have to remember to take daily medication or change the IUD or impant for years. For IUDs, because the effect is local, patients can use it even if they have other medical problems.
Any patient who seeks a LARC should be counseled about the possibility of abdominal/pelvic pain for IUDs and abnormal bleeding patterns for implants and the implications for discontinuing use, advised Dr. Wu.
Overall data, however, showed that more than 25% of women who discontinued a LARC method chose another LARC method, which suggests that some women are willing to try multiple types of this contraception, explained Dr. Wu.
All study findings were based on documented LARC data rather than patient reporting.
Recap on reproductive rights with David Hackney, MD, MS
December 20th 2022In this episode of Pap Talk, we spoke with David Hackney, MD, MS, maternal-fetal medicine physician at Case Western Reserve University and chair of ACOG's Ohio chapter for a full recap of where restrictions on reproductive rights have been and where they're going.
Listen
IUD placement within 48 hours nonsuperior vs 2 to 4 weeks after abortion
November 19th 2024A study reveals no significant difference in 6-month intrauterine device use between placements within 48 hours or 2 to 4 weeks after a second-trimester abortion, though earlier placement carries a higher expulsion risk.
Read More
In this episode of Pap Talk, Gloria Bachmann, MD, MSc, breaks down what it means to be a health care provider for incarcerated individuals, and explores the specific challenges women and their providers face during and after incarceration. Joined by sexual health expert Michael Krychman, MD, Bachmann also discusses trauma-informed care and how providers can get informed.
Listen
Preference for alternative contraceptive sources reported by many patients
October 31st 2024With nearly half of short-acting contraceptive users preferring non-traditional sources such as telehealth and over-the-counter options, a recent study highlights evolving patient needs in contraceptive access.
Read More