Forget about age- and risk-based thresholds when it comes to offering pregnant women prenatal diagnostic testing with amniocentesis or chorionic villus sampling (CVS). Both tests are cost-effective, regardless of maternal age or risk of carrying an affected fetus, according to the cost-effectiveness analysis of over 500 pregnant women.
Researchers calculated that in the US, compared with no prenatal diagnostic testing, amniocentesis costs less than $15,000 per quality-adjusted life-year gained for women of all ages and risk levels. They found no age threshold below which prenatal diagnosis was cost-ineffective (i.e., greater than $50,000 per quality-adjusted life-year gained).
While the results did not depend on age or risk level, they were very sensitive to the degree of reassurance a woman required from the test. In other words, the more worried a woman was about chromosomal abnormalities and to a lesser extent, about miscarriage, the more cost-effective the test became.
Harris RA, Washington E, Nease RF Jr, et al. Cost utility of prenatal diagnosis and the risk-based threshold. Lancet. 2004;363:276-282.
EHR-based models show promise in predicting postpartum depression
December 24th 2024Recent research published highlights the potential of electronic health record data to improve postpartum depression diagnosis, offering a step toward better mental health outcomes for birthing parents.
Read More
Midlife sexual health boosts for nonheterosexual women reported
December 23rd 2024A recent study highlights improved sexual function and reduced distress among nonheterosexual women during menopause compared to their heterosexual counterparts, shedding light on how sexual identity impacts well-being.
Read More