Legal: Was this laparoscopy unnecessary?
An unnecessary laparoscopy.
A Maryland woman, in her mid-40s, went to her gynecologist with complaints of pelvic pain. After an ultrasound revealed an ovarian cyst, the physician recommended surgery to explore the source of the pain and possibly remove the cyst and ovaries. After this procedure, the patient was diagnosed with a colon perforation. She required a colostomy and two additional surgeries, had a bowel obstruction, rectal vaginal fistula, and scarring.
In the lawsuit against her gynecologist, the woman claimed the procedure was unnecessary and perforation was negligent.
The physician argued that the operation was necessary to address and determine the cause of the patient's pain, and that the perforation was due to the patient's diverticulitis and did not occur during the procedure.
Department editor DAWN COLLINS, JD, is an attorney specializing in medical malpractice in Long Beach, CA. She welcomes feedback on this column via e-mail to DawnCF@aol.com
.
Chemoattractants in fetal membranes enhance leukocyte migration near term pregnancy
November 22nd 2024A recent study highlights the release of chemoattractants from human fetal membranes at term, driving leukocyte activation and migration, with implications for labor and postpartum recovery.
Read More
Reproductive genetic carrier screening: A tool for reproductive decision-making
November 22nd 2024A new study highlights the efficacy of couple-based reproductive genetic carrier screening in improving reproductive decisions and outcomes, emphasizing its growing availability and acceptance among diverse populations.
Read More
Early preterm birth risk linked to low PlGF levels during pregnancy screening
November 20th 2024New research highlights that low levels of placental growth factor during mid-pregnancy screening can effectively predict early preterm birth, offering a potential tool to enhance maternal and infant health outcomes.
Read More
