In a recent study, the investigational non-hormonal vaginal contraceptive Ovaprene (Dare Bioscience) met the criterion for contraceptive effect in all participants.
Takeaways
- Ovaprene, an investigational non-hormonal vaginal contraceptive, demonstrated consistent contraceptive effectiveness in all participants of a recent study.
- The contraceptive mechanism of Ovaprene involves a silicone ring with a permeable barrier, releasing ferrous gluconate to induce spermiostasis and prevent sperm movement.
- Clinician fitting is unnecessary for Ovaprene, which is inserted at the end of one menstrual period until the beginning of the next, simplifying contraceptive use.
- Postcoital tests confirmed Ovaprene's efficacy in preventing sperm penetration into midcycle cervical mucus, with successful results across multiple cycles.
- The study's findings support the initiation of a pivotal trial to further evaluate Ovaprene's contraceptive effectiveness over an extended period in individuals at risk of pregnancy.
Ovaprene includes a 55 mm silicone ring with a central permeable barrier, allowing fluid passage while limiting sperm movement. Spermiostasis is achieved through ferrous gluconate release by the ring, leading to oxidative damage in the sperm tail.
Clinician fitting is not required for Ovaprene, and it is inserted at the end of one menstrual period until the beginning of the next, eliminating the need for action during intercourse. To test the efficacy of a vaginal contraceptive, a postcoital test evaluating sperm entry into the cervical mucus should be performed.
In postcoital tests, a minimum number of high-power field (HPF) should be present. Investigators conducted a postcoital test to evaluate the efficacy of Ovaprene for preventing midcycle cervical mucus penetration from sperm, as well as the fit and ease of placement.
Participants included sexually active women with regular menstrual cycles not at risk of pregnancy. Their male partners were also included in the analysis.
Women attended 21 visits across 5 menstrual cycles including a baseline postcoital test cycle, diaphragm postcoital test cycle, Ovaprene safety, ferrous gluconate release, and acceptability assessment cycle, and 2 Ovaprene postcoital test cycles. Changes in postcoital test results were reported as the primary outcome of the analysis.
During the first cycle, baseline information was obtained. The contraceptive surrogate effect of the postcoital test was demonstrated during the second cycle. No intercourse actions occurred during the third cycle, but intercourse at the time of ovulation was evaluated during the Ovaprene postcoital test cycles.
Data about menses, intercourse, intravaginal product use, adverse events (AEs), medications, and device issues was obtained through participant self-report in a web-based electronic diary. Investigators performed evaluations of cervical mucus during the Cervical Mucus Check visit.