Quality of health care improved by pay-for-performance?

Article

Among 17 studies recently reviewed, five out of six studies of physician-level financial incentives and seven out of nine studies of group-level incentives showed a partial or positive effect on the quality of care.

Among 17 studies recently reviewed, five out of six studies of physician-level financial incentives and seven out of nine studies of group-level incentives showed a partial or positive effect on the quality of care. One of two studies of payment-system level incentives had a positive effect on access to care, while the other had a negative effect. In total, four of the 17 showed unintended consequences from incentives.

Based on these findings, the researchers, whose work was published in the Annals of Internal Medicine (8/15/2006), found that few generalizations could be made. However, they did note that programs using financial incentives often do produce a response, although the response may be an unintended one. The researchers offered a few tips when designing such programs to achieve an intended goal:

Recent Videos
Self-collection and extended genotyping advance cervical cancer screening | Image Credit: linkedin.com.
New trends in cervical cancer screening: Self-collection and barriers to adherence | Image Credit: linkedin.com.
Kameelah Phillips, MD, FACOG, NCMP, is featured in this series.
Kameelah Phillips, MD, FACOG, NCMP, is featured in this series.
HPV self-collection: Benefits, limitations, and future implications | Image Credit: forhers.com
Improving pediatric HPV vaccination rates: Early initiation and addressing disparities | Image Credit: blog.nemours.org.
New cervical cancer screening guidelines: What practitioners needs to know | Image Credit: forhers.com
COVID-19 Therapy Roundtable: Focusing on inpatient care
Related Content
© 2025 MJH Life Sciences

All rights reserved.