Are adverse outcomes of IVF the same as spontaneous conception?

Article

Babies conceived spontaneously and as a result of assisted fertilization by the same woman have similar risks of adverse outcomes, meaning that adverse outcomes among assisted fertilization babies may be attributable to the underlying causes of infertility rather than the fertility treatment itself, according to a report published online July 31 in The Lancet.

Babies conceived spontaneously and as a result of assisted fertilization by the same woman have similar risks of adverse outcomes, meaning that adverse outcomes among assisted fertilization babies may be attributable to the underlying causes of infertility rather than the fertility treatment itself, according to a report published online July 31 in The Lancet.

Liv Bente Romundstad, MD, of St. Olav's University Hospital in Trondheim, Norway, and colleagues conducted a study of singleton babies born to 2,546 Norwegian women who had conceived at least one child spontaneously and another after assisted fertilization. The cohort was drawn from 1,200,922 births after spontaneous fertilization and 8,229 after assisted fertilization.

Among siblings, the difference in mean birthweight between babies conceived spontaneously and those conceived using assisted fertilization was only 9 g, and there was a mean 0.6 day’s difference in duration of gestation, the researchers report. There was no difference between the two groups of babies in terms of risk of being small for gestational age or for preterm delivery.

“The adverse outcomes of assisted fertilization that we recorded in comparisons with spontaneous pregnancies in the general population could therefore be caused by the underlying infertility, rather than to factors related to the reproductive technology,” the authors conclude.

Romundstad

LB,

Romundstad

PR,

Sunde

A, et al. Effects of technology or maternal factors on perinatal outcome after assisted fertilisation: a population-based cohort study.

Lancet

. 2008, published online at DOI:10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61041-7

Recent Videos
Self-collection and extended genotyping advance cervical cancer screening | Image Credit: linkedin.com.
New trends in cervical cancer screening: Self-collection and barriers to adherence | Image Credit: linkedin.com.
Kameelah Phillips, MD, FACOG, NCMP, is featured in this series.
Kameelah Phillips, MD, FACOG, NCMP, is featured in this series.
HPV self-collection: Benefits, limitations, and future implications | Image Credit: forhers.com
Improving pediatric HPV vaccination rates: Early initiation and addressing disparities | Image Credit: blog.nemours.org.
New cervical cancer screening guidelines: What practitioners needs to know | Image Credit: forhers.com
COVID-19 Therapy Roundtable: Focusing on inpatient care
Related Content
© 2025 MJH Life Sciences

All rights reserved.